The Impact of Political Connections on the Relationship Between Sustainable Development Reporting and Cost of Capital in Petrochemical Companies Listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange

Authors

  • Abbas Alimoradi Sharifabadi * Department of Accounting, Petroleum Industry University, Tehran, Iran. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3504-9544
  • Reza Khorsandian Department of Management Accounting, Petroleum Industry University, Tehran, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22105/tqfb.v3i1.82

Abstract

In today’s world, environmental and social issues have become central concerns for stakeholders alongside economic considerations. The primary aim of this study is to examine the impact of Sustainability Reporting (SR) on the Cost of Capital (COC) and to investigate the moderating role of Political Connections (PC) in this relationship within petrochemical companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). From a purpose perspective, the study is developmental, and in terms of nature, it is descriptive-correlational. The statistical population comprises all petrochemical companies active in Iran’s capital market during 2018–2023 (1397–1402 in the Iranian calendar). After applying screening criteria, a final sample of 19 companies (108 firm-year observations) was selected. To test the hypotheses, a moderated multivariate regression model was employed using panel data with a fixed-effects approach. The findings indicate a significant negative relationship between the quality of SR and the COC, suggesting that increased transparency in sustainability disclosures reduces financing costs. Furthermore, the results reveal that PC moderate the strength of this relationship. Specifically, in firms with high levels of political influence and connections, the capital-cost-reducing effect of SR is attenuated, as access to political rents substitutes for the benefits of informational transparency. 

Keywords:

Sustainability reporting, Political connections, Sustainability disclosure, Panel data approach, Cost of capital, Petrochemical industry

References

  1. [1] Amanullah, M., Moni, H. R., Tumpa, K. K., & Islam, S. A. (2024). Does environmental, social and governance disclosure practices promote customer brand perception? the moderating effect of customers’ sustainability responsiveness. Journal of risk analysis and crisis response, 14(3), 314-332. https://doi.org/10.54560/jracr.v14i3.502

  2. [2] Asadi, T. (2024). Investigating the effect of political connections on the quality of audit firms by considering the moderating role of agency costs in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Accounting and management perspective, 7(92), 19-.33 (In Persian). http://www.jamv.ir/article_203300_841900965c35f1255063d068e87ace64.pdf

  3. [3] Rezaei, M., & Saadati, N. (2014). Investigating the effect of political connections and corporate governance on the risk of stock price collapse. Financial accounting research, 6(2), 105-122. (In Persian).

  4. [4] Mehran, S., Mehrani, Q., & Hosseini, S. M. S. (2024). Accounting theory. Negah Danesh Publications. (In Persian). https://www.digikala.com/product/dkp-2519350/

  5. [5] Boubakri, N., Guedhami, O., Mishra, D., & Saffar, W. (2012). Political connections and the cost of equity capital. Journal of corporate finance, 18(3), 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2012.02.005

  6. [6] Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The accounting review, 86(1), 59–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005

  7. [7] Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting & accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Prentice hall. https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/95486/

  8. [8] Salehi, H., Sajadi, S. H., Khodadadi, V., & Rasekh, A. (2017). Modeling the factors affecting cost of equity capital: Evidences from Tehran Stock Exchange. Asset management and financing, 5(2), 167-184. (In Persian). https://www.magiran.com/paper/1716858

  9. [9] Chaney, P. K., Faccio, M., & Parsley, D. (2011). The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms. Journal of accounting and economics, 51(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.07.003

  10. [10] Salehi, M., Bairami, L., Hoshyar, R., & Bairami, V. (2016). Factors affecting the cost of capital with emphasis on audit quality in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Financial and economic policies, 4(15), 135-158. (In Persian). https://profdoc.um.ac.ir/paper-abstract-1062430.html

  11. [11] Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic management journal, 35(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2131

  12. [12] Nguyen, H. C., & Duong, H. K. (2025). The impact of sustainability reporting on the cost of capital: evidence from Vietnam’s listed companies. Journal of financial reporting and accounting. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-09-2024-0642

  13. [13] Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of management review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331

  14. [14] Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

  15. [15] Shokouhi, M., Mohtashami Pour, R., & Hosseini Mehr, S. H. (2020). The investigation of challenges of iranian petrochemical industry within the framework of general policies on resilient economy. Majlis & rahbord, 27(102), 295-330. (In Persian). https://sid.ir/paper/407415/fa

  16. [16] Onwe, J. C., Ullah, E., Ansari, M. A., Sahoo, M., & Dhayal, K. S. (2024). Industrialization meets sustainability: Analysing the role of technological innovations, energy efficiency and urbanisation for major industrialized economies. Journal of environmental management, 372, 123297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123297

  17. [17] Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=NpmA_qEiOpkC&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=

  18. [18] El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of banking & finance, 35(9), 2388–2406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007

  19. [19] Fisman, R. (2001). Estimating the value of political connections. American economic review, 91(4), 1095–1102. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.1095

  20. [20] Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917

  21. [21] Hosseinniakani, M., Khatri, I., Knardal, P. S., & Wahlstrøm, R. R. (2026). Abnormal disclosure and the cost of equity capital: Evidence from textual characteristics of sustainability disclosure. Review of quantitative finance and accounting. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-026-01503-y

  22. [22] Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The journal of finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x

  23. [23] Dafchahi, G. P., Largani, M. S., Alikhani, R., & Pourali, M. (2022). The effect of voluntary disclosure of historical and forward-looking non-financial information on sustainability performance. Journal of investment knowledge, 4(44), 143-173. (In Persian). http://www.jik-ifea.ir/article_20335_9bda7c6fe28e932019d80a352cafb764.pdf?lang=en

  24. [24] Ashrafi, M. (2026). Firm life cycle and the cost of equity capital: Does corporate social responsibility matter? Interdisciplinary journal of management studies, 19(2), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijms.2025.394597.677609

  25. [25] Diamond, D. W., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1991). Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital. The journal of finance, 46(4), 1325–1359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04620.x

  26. [26] Muttakin, M. B., Mihret, D. G., & Khan, A. (2018). Corporate political connection and corporate social responsibility disclosures: A neo-pluralist hypothesis and empirical evidence. Accounting, auditing & accountability journal, 31(2), 725–744. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2015-2078

  27. [27] Du, J., Bai, T., & Chen, S. (2019). Integrating corporate social and corporate political strategies: Performance implications and institutional contingencies in China. Journal of business research, 98, 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.014

  28. [28] Haugen, R. A., & Senbet, L. W. (1986). Corporate finance and taxes: a review. Financial management, 15(3), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3664840

  29. [29] Greene, W. H. (2018). Econometric analysis. Business & Economics. https://books.google.com/books/about/Econometric_Analysis.html?id=xGZRvgAACAAJ

  30. [30] Wang, K., Bai, Y., Dong, Z., & Zhu, J. (2025). Heterogeneous impact of ESG Disclosure: A meta-analysis. Journal of cleaner production, 516, 145804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145804

  31. [31] Emarati, A., Nassirzadeh, F., & Askarany, D. (2025). Political connections and earnings management in emerging markets-new evidence. Review of behavioral finance, 17(5), 785–806. https://www.emerald.com/rbf/article-abstract/17/5/785/1278535

Published

2026-03-24

How to Cite

Alimoradi Sharifabadi, A., & Khorsandian, R. (2026). The Impact of Political Connections on the Relationship Between Sustainable Development Reporting and Cost of Capital in Petrochemical Companies Listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Transactions on Quantitative Finance and Beyond, 3(1), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.22105/tqfb.v3i1.82

Similar Articles

21-30 of 49

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.